The Extensive Use of Symbolism in Emily Dickinsons Poem #315 :: Emily Dickinson Poem 315 Essays

The Extensive Use of Symbolism in Emily Dickinsons Poem 315 As I had no foregoing experience with Emily Dickinsons work, I was unsure of what to expect from this assignment. I read the poem about fifteen or twenty times before I was til now able to ask myself legitimate headlands about Dickinsons thoughts as she composed this work over two hundred years ago. I couldnt even look to the claim for guidance...ugh, this is going to be tough ran through my head over and over. I began by researching 315 on the Internet and in our library. I found more opinions than I could possibly wade through in one summer semester and resigned myself to limiting my research to the basics and forming my own opinions. I have learned in writings classes since past-many, many years ago I might add-that insureing symbolisms that exist in poetry is the key to understanding the poem itself. Emily Dickinsons 315 is absolutely FULL of symbolism, so much so that I had to break it down--almost word-by -word-- to begin to understand what Dickinson is trying to tell her readers. The first question that I had-and probably the one of most significance-- was who is HE??? Dickinson begins with He fumbles at your soul...-- I couldnt even understand who HE was. After researching this, I realized that I was not alone and that various readers of 315 have debated my question over decades. Robert Weisbuch in Emily Dickinsons Poetry (1972) explained that he felt that the primary figure (He) is intentionally ambiguous because his identity doesnt really matter. Weisbuch further postulated that Dickinson wants the reader not to understand the cause, but to focus on experiencing the terrible moment (pp. 98). Mr. Weisbuch seems to feel that He is many things (e.g. pianist, smithy, Thor and wind) and yet his definition is of little importance. I was somewhat relieved when I read Weisbuchs theory on He because each time I read He fumbles... I come to believe that He is a distinct entity. I fi rst felt that Dickinson was referring to a prominent male figure in her life-maybe her father or her lover-but during subsequent readings my thoughts turned to less obvious possibilities much(prenominal) as God or non-human objects such as a storm. Even after a weeks worth of research, I still am not indisputable that I fully understand which direction she is hoping to lead her reader.